Rebels with a Cause

Days before the Woodstock music festival is set to begin, Elizabeth Reed faces a bigger problem than whether to run away with her boyfriend to an unknown future in New York state. U.S. Marshals begin to forcibly remove squatters from a spot on the Delaware River the government has claimed for a dam, a spot very near Elizabeth’s home, which has also been scheduled for flooding.

Working as a stringer for the local newspaper, Elizabeth agrees to photograph the assault. Despite her fears—her parents face eviction and the confiscation of their land—and her discomfort around a far-too-forward reporter, she accompanies him to cover the eviction. Confronted by a wall of armed marshals, her fantasy of making it to Woodstock looks wishful at best.

This chapter, which occurs near the end of the book, marks a turning point for Elizabeth, as well as the country.

Although Born Under a Bad Sign is a novel, it is based on events I witnessed as a journalist. Note the eviction and possible internment of the squatters by the marshals. It raises a question may struggle with today: Have we learned anything from that decade of peace and love?

33.

STEPHEN DUFFY PULLED the car onto the shoulder near the roadblock where the U.S. Marshals had established as base camp and patted Elizabeth’s knee. His fingers were plump and pale, with dark red hair that looked as if it had been sewn between the knuckles. She brushed away the hand and produced what she hoped was a stern look, one that seemed lost on him, since he was staring through the windshield.

       “Don’t be intimidated by the guns,” he said and gave her knee another tap. “They almost never shoot photographers.”

       She followed his gaze. There were at least a dozen state police officers and five times as many marshals, the latter dressed in battle gear—blue jumpsuits with pistols strapped to their waists, gasmasks hanging from their belts, shotguns at the ready. As she and Stephen stepped from the car, heads turned. No one looked happy to see them.

       Elizabeth felt excited and nervous. She’d been up half the night, worrying about the raid on the river people as the locals called the squatters. Yet Stephen had forbidden her from contacting them. Given the complete lack of information, she’d prepared as best she could, dressing in work boots and shirt over military fatigues she’d purchased at the army navy store. Her father’s fishing vest provided enough pockets for lenses, film, and a notebook for jotting the names of the people she photographed—“collecting IDs,” as Stephen had described the process. She’d strung both Nikons over her neck, one in front, the other on the side, fresh batteries in the motor drives. With no camera bag to intrude, she could move quickly.

     Stepping from the car, she felt she might have to. The marshals formed a wall in front of the roadblock. They were backed not only by the state police but a half-dozen construction workers, probably the same ones who had crushed the buildings in the village. They stood beside their backhoes and bulldozers and drank from Styrofoam cups that steamed in the predawn air. It had rained overnight and now, at a quarter to six—an ungodly hour for them but late for Elizabeth—the mist hung in the trees like tent caterpillars, the marshals hovering above the roadway like ghosts.

       Behind her, doors slammed, and a half-dozen cars disgorged the competition, readily identifiable by their clutter of notebooks, tape recorders, cameras, and lights. Fedoras with press cards attached would have made for a better photo.

       Stephen approached the roadblock. “Do what they say, but don’t let them push you around. Be aggressive. You’ve got as much right to be here as they do.”

       Elizabeth thumbed the film advance lever until she thought it would snap. “In case you hadn’t noticed, I am the very opposite of aggressive.”

       “Then stay back. Use a long lens. Duck if you hear gunfire.”

       She felt a chill unrelated to the temperature of the air, which had to be over sixty by now. “Thanks for the warning.”

       “Go for emotion—weeping mothers, crying babies, any sign of violence against the squatters. Treat them like they’re the Israelites fleeing Egypt, with pharaoh and his chariots hot on their trail.”

       He didn’t wait for a reply but moved steadily toward the front line.

       Elizabeth hurried to catch up. “I guess the photo essay didn’t do any good.”

       Her photo spread of the valley’s destruction had hit the newsstands days ago and she hadn’t heard a reaction from anyone.

      “Our Harrisburg bureau chief walked a copy to the governor’s office. You should be proud.”

       “It didn’t stop this.”

       “One small hole in the dam,” he said. “Keep poking away.”

       “I thought that was ‘plugging away?’”

       “Only if you’re a little Dutch boy with a lot of digits.”

       “You have the strangest sense of humor.”

       He gave her the full-bearded smile. “You’ll get used to it.”

       Journalists flanked their sides, the group moving toward the barricade in a wave.

       “Why are there so many reporters here?” she asked.

       “We’ve got friends in high places.”

       “The attorney general called you personally?”

       “He’s running for governor on a law-and-order platform and wants a head start. That’s him over there, the short guy with the salt-and-pepper hair and beard. Make sure you get him in a shot.”

       Elizabeth spotted a man wearing a navy windbreaker with US MARSHALS imprinted on the back. He said something to one of the state troopers and laughed.

       She felt appalled. “This isn’t theater. People’s lives are at stake.”

       “Politics as usual. You’ll get used to it.”

       She thought she wouldn’t but didn’t have time to speak, because the marshals moved out, walking River Road until they reached the dirt lane that led toward the river and the squatters’ camp. The reporters tried to follow but were stopped by the state police.

       “Let ’em through!” the man in the windbreaker shouted and led the way.

       Stephen trotted next to him, talking and writing as he plowed through the undergrowth. Elizabeth grabbed a shot of the pair. Then, hoping to stay ahead of the marshals, she slipped through the woods, climbing over stone rows and broken patches of barbed wire to emerge in the field where she’d first spotted the camp. She was in position when the invading army arrived. They were methodical, breaking into teams of two, banging on doors, checking every house, barn, outbuilding, lean-to, wigwam, and tent. The message was always the same: the inhabitants had thirty minutes to evacuate.

       The river people poured into the field, shirtless men and barefoot women cradling babies and half-naked children running like refugees from a village in Vietnam, frightened, crying, fleeing the occupying force. Not everyone gave up their homes. One man shouted down the marshals from a rooftop. Another climbed a tree and refused to leave. A third held a baby aloft, as a shield or sacrifice, Elizabeth couldn’t tell.

       She photographed everything that moved, took a knee to reload, and kept firing. When she got closer, she gathered the names, ages, and addresses of the places where the river people had lived, always expressing her sorrow at the evictions. Despite Stephen’s warning, she asked permission to take their pictures, shooting portraiture in the middle of the skirmish, marveling at the beauty and strength of their faces. If the marshals waved her off, she rounded the buildings and approached from a different angle, silhouetting the law as it marched the squatters toward the road. The exodus was almost Biblical.

       When the heavy equipment arrived, Elizabeth retreated, using a longer lens to document the destruction as the bulldozers demolished houses and barns, scraping into heaps the tents, mattresses, bicycles, and belongings left behind. The sound was pitiless, dogging her as she moved from house to house in an attempt to stay a step ahead.

       The thought of all those homeless people made her stomach turn. Were they under arrest? Would the marshals separate the adults from their children? Where were they being taken? Where would they live? And when the law was done with the camp, would it come for her family, and anyone else who stood in the way of the dam?

By the time we got to Woodstock . . .

It is 1969, capstone of a tumultuous decade, and life in the rural town of Pennsboro, Pa. is about to explode. A dam that would flood the valley pits family against family. Protesters riot. Buildings burn. Amid the chaos, two lovers risk everything to fight for their dreams.

Elizabeth Reed feels conflicted. She loves the river the government wants to dam and a musician who can’t settle on any one person or place. Hayden Quinn, the guitarist Rolling Stone calls the next Jimi Hendrix, feeds a single obsession—to play Woodstock, the biggest concert of his life. He presents Elizabeth with a terrible dilemma: stay to save her family farm or relinquish her dreams to follow Quinn into the unknown.

Born Under a Bad Sign not only tells their story but the story of a generation. It’s opening sets the stage for a very personal battle for peace and love.

1.

FROM BEYOND THE hills came a jagged flash of light. Elizabeth Reed counted five seconds before the sound rumbled across the infield of the raceway, this makeshift venue for the largest outdoor rock concert on the East Coast. Another flash, and another ripple of thunder. In an improvized call and response, the crowd echoed its approval. The tower that held the lights and PA system trembled. So did Elizabeth’s arms and legs. She let the dizziness pass and, willing her stomach to settle, tucked both cameras under her arms and climbed to the sky.

      The warm-up band had just finished, the announcer promising that Orwell, fresh off its national tour, would soon take the stage. A wall of people surged forward. Despite the scalding July heat, this was the group’s homecoming and the locals had turned out in force, thousands of ragged kids with beards and muumuus, jostling each other in a fog of beer and smoke. Two years after Monterey Pop and the festival had come of age. So had the band.

      The tower swayed enough to cause Elizabeth to question her bravado. Despite the knot in her stomach, she climbed past speakers and spotlights for a better view of the makeshift stage, a plywood floor laid across a half-dozen flatbed trailers. The platform had been hastily constructed for the festival, the biggest in Pennsylvania’s Minisink Valley and a warm-up for one she’d heard could be even bigger, next month’s Woodstock Music & Art Fair in nearby New York.

      That was the real object of the evening’s performance, a final rehearsal for Orwell and its leader, Hayden Quinn, the guitarist Rolling Stone had called the next Jimi Hendrix, the man that Elizabeth, fresh out of high school, had followed halfway across the country as the band’s unofficial photographer. It was make or break time for the group. The band’s manager, Elizabeth’s Uncle Morey, had invited the man organizing Woodstock, Michael Lang, to attend the concert. So far, she hadn’t seen anyone fitting Lang’s description.

      As the wind rose to meet the night, Elizabeth realized that, if the crowd pressed closer, the tower could tip. Since her dizziness disappeared if she didn’t look down, she focused on the distance, tracking the Delaware as it wandered between Pennsylvania and New Jersey like a nomad, flowing freely despite the government’s effort to dam the river and drown her family’s farm. With the telephoto lens, she could isolate her property, snug in the rich bottom land of the valley. Camera in hand, river and fields spread below, she felt exhausted, scared, and ridiculously happy.

      Voices below startled her. Dressed in black, two members of the security crew waved her from the tower. The yelling morphed into the sound of hammering. Against the raw wood of the stage, Tommy Reed nailed cardboard cylinders to rows of two-by-tens, preparing the fireworks for the evening’s finale. He seemed dwarfed by the munitions.

      When the sound system kicked in with a recording of “Crossroads,” Elizabeth gripped the metal pipes to maintain her balance. Despite the rush of adrenaline, her arms ached from lugging a pair of heavy Nikons all day. With a normal lens, the weight seemed bearable. But when loaded with a zoom and a motor drive, the outfit felt as if it weighed as much as a bale of hay. Before she descended, she snapped a picture of Tommy as he wired his makeshift rig, the camera hot and slippery in her hands. Heaven help them if she dropped it on his head.

      As soon as she landed, the security officers assumed their positions in front of the stage while the roadies assembled the last of the equipment. Her older brother Robbie frowned as he arranged cymbals and tightened the drumheads, his rusty hair in a deliberately unhip buzzcut. Reaching above his head, Cordell White plugged his bass into a stack of amplifiers and plucked a few notes. Unlike Robbie, who wore his usual white T-shirt and shorts, Del had dressed for show in leather pants, a jacket of purple satin, and a high-crowned Navajo hat with a yellow plume. Both of them looked frustrated, or mad.

      Tommy caught her eye and jerked his head toward the edge of the stage. He, too, appeared angry, a look that was highlighted by chapped lips, hair the color of licorice, and a nose as sharp as a chisel. The only festive thing about him was the tie-dyed headband.

      “Hey, Cuz,” she said, drawing a face that signaled either irritation or fatigue.

      He smelled of oil and mint. As usual, he wore sunglasses so dark that she wondered how he could see to connect the fireworks. Pecking him on the cheek, she took in the rows of rockets, mortars, and Roman candles that crowded both sides of the stage and felt a twinge of concern. “Aren’t they a little close?”

      Tommy scratched his back with a screwdriver. “Close?”

      “To the band.”

      Another crack of thunder and Tommy dragged a tarp over the pods. “Wait and see.”

      As security stopped a ginger-haired man flashing press credentials, Elizabeth regained the tower. One by one, the members of Orwell wandered onto the stage to a cascade of applause. Robbie positioned his cymbals, Del and Quinn hunched over tuning pegs, and Mattie, jiggling her ample ass, asked the crowd how they were doing. As the band struck its first tectonic chord, the audience thundered their approval.

      Mattie belted out the first number with a ferocity that shook the towers, all trace of her Southern accent lost in the ricochet of sound. Robbie thrashed as if he were drowning in one of the cow ponds on the family farm. Even Del, who usually bobbed in place, stalked the boards, his face a darkening cloud.

      Quinn followed with a scorching lead that featured a collision of Bach, Thelonious Monk, and Hendrix. Shirtless now and barefoot, he played with a single-mindedness akin to religious devotion, prowling the stage, slashing his guitar, bending strings until they threatened to snap. He hammered the neck with both hands as if playing a piano, the sound a frenetic cross between Paganini and Robert Johnson, the shaman who’d sold his soul to the devil for his talent.

      From her perch, she tracked the band, feeling more than hearing the smack of the mirror as it lifted to admit the light, the whir of the motor drive as it advanced the frames. Pace yourself, she thought, or you’ll run out of film.

      Like a tsunami, the intensity of the music grew, Quinn hurtling his body into the wave of sound, his head bowed, shoulders hunched, fingers on fire. Dreadlocks flew as he reared, face twisted in ecstasy, the notes tracking across his lips. No matter how many times she’d seen the show, Elizabeth felt stunned, and not just by the acoustical acrobatics. With the flick of his fingers, Quinn guided the music from brave to anxious to calm. Elizabeth felt warmth and humor, sadness and pity, and so much in between. It astonished her that anyone could convey such emotion without the use of a single word.

      The band continued the pace, blazing through songs as if racing to an uncertain end. By the close of the set, their faces shone with euphoria and sweat. Robbie raised his sticks, caught the eye of Quinn and Del, and they miraculously finished on the same beat, even as Tommy launched the first volley of fireworks, burning the night in a shower of red and gold.

      The musicians filtered off stage, waited a beat, and returned to a swelling ovation. With a deep bow, and a nod from Mattie, they launched into one of the medleys Quinn had arranged as an encore. Even before Elizabeth traced their faces through the telephoto, she could tell that, as the music grew more frantic, they struggled to hear. Hitting the final chorus, Mattie looked over her shoulder as if she were lost in the woods. Robbie buried his head in his drum kit. Del and Quinn traded places, Del moving to the monitors along the wing while Quinn arched over the stage to listen to the PA speakers.

      The music had grown so loud that Elizabeth could barely feel the vibration through the camera body as the motor drive cranked through another roll of film, thirty-six exposures in a matter of seconds before she hunched to reload.

      This time, the band didn’t leave the stage. They bowed slightly, as if they’d expended so much energy they had little left for movement, before launching into the second encore, a reprise of their single, “Bomb Babies,” that ended in a cataclysmic version of Tchaikovsky’s 1812 Overture. Quinn had shortened the piece for maximum impact and, when he nodded, Tommy let loose with his final volley.

      From the corner of the viewfinder, Elizabeth watched the skyrockets arc into the night and explode in phosphorescent swirls. She grabbed a shot of Tommy, who timed the bursts to coincide with the downbeat. As the encore hit its crescendo, he quickened the pace, unleashing a white-hot assault that mimicked the original cannon fire. The band fed off the energy, Quinn and Robbie flailing, Del leaning dangerously close to the fireworks while Mattie spread her arms to embrace the crowd.

      Then, as Elizabeth lifted the camera to her face, the stage flashed with a blinding light and the world exploded.

The moral hazard of AI (no, it’s not the apocalypse)

I just received a note that Narrative magazine’s Spring 2026 Story Contest is accepting entries. Narrative winners and finalists have won Pulitzer and Pushcart Prizes, as well as placement in high-profile anthologies. In addition to publishing emerging writers, the magazine says it reaches a worldwide audience of 325,000 readers. It’s good market for literary writers.

Unless you’re using artificial intelligence, or AI. Narrative’s contest guidelines end with a single sentence: “We do not accept work that includes machine-generated text.”

For authors and other creatives tempted to enhance their work with AI, the writing is on the wall: Using Large Language Models (LLM) like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, CoPilot and others to research and critique your work is acceptable. Using those services to generate content is not. (We’ll talk about the use of AI in photography in a bit.)

Commercial publishing

Where do commercial publishing houses stand on the use of AI??

According to Microsoft’s CoPilot, Penguin Random House UK advises writers that AI is not a substitute for human imagination and that AI tools may be used selectively but with caution. PRH, which only accepts manuscripts through literary agents, offers no specific advice for authors on the use of LLMs on either its U.S. or UK sites.

At business and academic publisher Wiley, authors may only use AI technology as a companion to their writing process, not a replacement. “As always, authors must take full responsibility for the accuracy of all content, and verify that all claims, citations, references, and analyses are aligned with their expertise and research,” Wiley states on the AI guidelines page of its website.

Authors must also document their use of AI tools and “disclose the use of AI technologies when submitting their material to a Wiley-published journal.”

The Authors Guild offers a model clause for contracts between authors and publishers that discourages the use of machine-generated text in a work. “Author shall not be required to use generative AI or to work from AI-generated text. Author shall disclose to Publisher if any AI-generated text is included in the submitted manuscript, and may not include more than [a de minimis/5%] AI-generated text.”

Self-publishing

For independently published writers, Amazon—the world’s largest platform for self-published books—requires a disclosure for those who used AI to create their work. The company’s content guidelines for books released through its Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP) arm offers this warning:

“We require you to inform us of AI-generated content (text, images, or translations) when you publish a new book or make edits to and republish an existing book through KDP. AI-generated images include cover and interior images and artwork. You are not required to disclose AI-assisted content. We distinguish between AI-generated and AI-assisted content as follows:

“AI-generated: We define AI-generated content as text, images, or translations created by an AI-based tool. If you used an AI-based tool to create the actual content (whether text, images, or translations), it is considered “AI-generated,” even if you applied substantial edits afterwards.

“AI-assisted: If you created the content yourself, and used AI-based tools to edit, refine, error-check, or otherwise improve that content (whether text or images), then it is considered “AI-assisted” and not “AI-generated.” Similarly, if you used an AI-based tool to brainstorm and generate ideas, but ultimately created the text or images yourself, this is also considered “AI-assisted” and not “AI-generated.” It is not necessary to inform us of the use of such tools or processes.”

Why does that matter? Because, according to wordsrated.com, Amazon releases more than 1.4 million self‑published books each year.

Photography

Photographers are also grappling with the use of AI, with organizations disqualifying from competition images that use generative AI. Contests run by the Florida Camera Club Council (FCCC) allow the use of AI to remove noise (what film photographers call grain) and other distractions from images but forbid the machine generation of images.

FCCC’s contest rules are simple: if you add something to an image you did not photograph, that photograph may not quality for competition.

“Every part of an image must be the maker’s own work,” FCCC says on its website. “Artificial Intelligence or Al cannot be used to add elements to an image that were not taken by the maker. Al functions such as denoising, healing, sharpening, expanding canvas are allowed, as long as Al generated objects, people, or other elements are not introduced into the image. Makers may be asked to submit original images prior to approval.”

Why does this matter? Because people expect an artform that began its life documenting reality to provide them with visual truth, and organizations like FCCC, which screen entries from some 50 independent camera clubs throughout the state, have become the gatekeepers of that tradition. FCCC is not alone. There are thousands of photography clubs operating in the United States, according to DuckDuckGo’s search assistant. Microsoft’s CoPilot puts the number at 700.

Moral hazard

The same ethical considerations apply to writing. Using AI tools for research is OK, as long as writers follow the traditional rules of authorship and disclose the source. Using those tools to create words and images from the ether is also acceptable, as long as we disclose that fact, although it does create a moral hazard where corporations take risks for which others—writers, photographers and other creatives whose work is appropriated to train these applications—pay the price.

We’ll let the bots have the next-to-last word.

“The benefits of AI tools for creatives are surprisingly broad and often transformative,” according to ChatGPT (prompt: what are the benefits to creatives of using AI tools?). “AI can offer prompts, variations, or even complete drafts that help kickstart human creativity. While AI is powerful, it’s not a replacement for human creativity.”

As long as we’re transparent.

Open circuit: no generative AI used to make this photo I took of a circuit board.

Stormy weather

Starting a new project is never easy. Working during a storm that threatens your entire state makes it even harder to concentrate.

Now that Hurricane Irma has swept through Florida and spared our home, I’m trying to refocus efforts on a new novel, tentatively titled Born Under a Bad Sign, although The Peaceable Kingdom might provide an ironic description of the theme.

Set in 1969 just before the historic Woodstock Music & Art Fair, the book pits the residents of eastern Pennsylvania against the government in a battle to save or dam the Delaware River. It introduces two young people, a budding photographer named Elizabeth Reed and a prodigal musician called Hayden Quinn, who struggle with their own personal conflicts as they weigh the risks and rewards of love and fame.

For Elizabeth, the peace of the Minisink Valley is a form of paradise. For Quinn, whom Rolling Stone calls the next Jimi Hendrix, Eden lies to the north, at Max Yasgur’s farm. Whether they realize their dreams is an open question.

Unlike its predecessors, the CW McCoy and Brinker novels, this work is more mainstream, an exploration of the baffling mysteries faced by a sixteen-year-old woman on her emotional journey to adulthood.

I started working on paper (hence, the image of the notecards) before graduating to Word, with its document-view feature that uses headers to provide a visual outline of the manuscript. Less onerous than outlining, it’s a system I recommend to fellow writers who want flexibility as well as organization.